Swimming naked is called "skinny dipping". I don't know what you'd call sleeping naked though. James Bond never wears pyjamas. Neither, if Homer Simspon is to be believed, did Thomas Eddison.I have tried it a couple of times. The problem I find though is that I wrap myself up in the bedclothes to compensate and then wake up covered in sweat - and smelling! It makes the bedclothes damp and smelly too.
It is sort of sexy though.I remember the first time I masturbated "properly" I was sleeping naked in a double bed in a friend's house. The first time I saw myself ejaculate was in the room's en suite bathroom. I used to be pretty sure that the main reason en suite bathrooms at college were more popular with boys than with girls (strangely, you'd have thought) was so that the boys could masturbate in them without being disturbed - and it still makes a certain amount of sense.
Well, I masturbated a bit last night but did not actually ejaculate. I did discharge a certain amount of pre-ejaculate, but, to use the moral theology terms, my pollution was not completed. Morally of course that's hardly any different, though it does feel different, because the body retains a certain sense of integrity, even if the soul doesn't, and of course there's no refraction either.
The point James C made a couple of posts ago is quite right. The real problem though is that unnatural acts, such as sodomy and masturbation, almost by definition do not have positive outcomes. With sex, at the very least, you're left naked and feeling very un-sexy, and if you've been doing it with a guy on the padded floor of a dark little room somewhere far from home, where you had to pay to get in in the first place, then you just feel a bit of a fool. At least the jizz in one's jim-jams doesn't cost anything. But it's still pointless and useless.
It is sort of sexy though.I remember the first time I masturbated "properly" I was sleeping naked in a double bed in a friend's house. The first time I saw myself ejaculate was in the room's en suite bathroom. I used to be pretty sure that the main reason en suite bathrooms at college were more popular with boys than with girls (strangely, you'd have thought) was so that the boys could masturbate in them without being disturbed - and it still makes a certain amount of sense.
Well, I masturbated a bit last night but did not actually ejaculate. I did discharge a certain amount of pre-ejaculate, but, to use the moral theology terms, my pollution was not completed. Morally of course that's hardly any different, though it does feel different, because the body retains a certain sense of integrity, even if the soul doesn't, and of course there's no refraction either.
The point James C made a couple of posts ago is quite right. The real problem though is that unnatural acts, such as sodomy and masturbation, almost by definition do not have positive outcomes. With sex, at the very least, you're left naked and feeling very un-sexy, and if you've been doing it with a guy on the padded floor of a dark little room somewhere far from home, where you had to pay to get in in the first place, then you just feel a bit of a fool. At least the jizz in one's jim-jams doesn't cost anything. But it's still pointless and useless.
No comments:
Post a Comment